Two
opposites seldom reconcile, in fact they’re always at loggerheads.
The
Mahabharata offers another perspective that is more about life management.
Management
involves dealing with tempting times and testing times which is harsh realities of life. The idealistic
approach for life is very fantastic, and most of the times it stays in the realm
of the fantasy world. Idealistic understanding combined with the
realistic approach, gives rise to confident action. One of the major theme discussed in mahabharata is the struggle between being good in a bad world, and how difficult it is to do that. Some are very idealistic, and and some are very ambitious for only physical gain at any cost, for them idealism is useless to be discarded in the dustbin of past.
Bhishma
personifies selflessness. very idealistic. Personal agenda was far from his existence. He did
not lead a normal life, rather surrendered his being fully for others. Result?
-Massive exploitation by Kurus, headed by Duryodhana. In one sense, his
selflessness had no benefit to others. And of course, there was no personal
consideration anyway.
Dhritarashthra
represents complete selfishness. fiercely ambitious. He couldn’t go beyond his blindness, physical one and the moral one too. and therefore looking for any opportunity to install his son as the king of Hastinapura. which he missed because of blindness. To achieve this, he was actively conspiring to destroy the
Pandavas. Unfortunately, he did not realize that his son was blackmailing him
because of his unfound attachment. The result? –His desires were blown away and
all his sons got death on the battlefield.
The
Pandavas had the same psychology as Bhisma but with Krishna they were practical. To do good to others was their motto. To
achieve this ideology, they had to be self-conscious. They collected resources as an individuals and then utilized for the growth of the society.
The
story of Arjuna and Eklavya illustrates this point better. When Arjuna saw
Eklavya demonstrating better skills , he asked his teacher how Eklavya was better than him? His Guru demanded Eklavya to pull out his thumb, and sure enough, he
received a thumb as gift, and became an ordinary archer.
Sounds harsh, but the reality was that Arjuna used his superiority caused by
the inferiority of Eklavya to establish good governance based on the teachings
of Gita.
For any any good Governance, the governor or a leader has to inspire sacrifice in their followers, and some time bring down the opponent who is not competent to lead, but has some isolated skills, has to stop him from growing, harsh but is it not reality of mundane existence?
The
Pandavas used selfishness as a tool to be selfless servants of God. The
Kauravas used selflessness of Bhishma, ambition of Karna, friendship of
Ashwatthama and selflishness of Dhritharashthra to be utterly selfish.
What tool
would we like to use? and for what? the choice is ours. selfishness for selflessness or selflessness to be exploited by selfish people like Duryodhana? choice is ours.
Thank you very much Prabhu for helping us understand deeper lessons from scriptures and help us broaden our understanding about Devotional Service.
ReplyDelete